Youngest Kids in Class Found to Get More ADHD Meds

The youngest kids in the class may have a tougher time with academics and behavior, a new study found.

Icelandic elementary school students in the bottom third of their fourth-grade class for age were almost twice as likely to score low on math and language arts standardized tests, study author Helga Zoëga of Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City and colleagues found.

They were also 50 percent more likely to be prescribed stimulants forattention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by seventh grade than the oldest kids in their class, the group reported in the December issue of Pediatrics.

"Birthday cutoffs for school entry necessarily lead to an age span of at least 12 months within a classroom," they noted. "At age 5, this span accounts for 20 percent of the child's age and presents a difference in maturity and performance between the youngest and the oldest child in class."

Since the gap appeared to persist through age 14 in the study, "this should be taken into account when evaluating children's performance and behavior in school to prevent unnecessary stimulant treatment," to make sure kids aren't getting a lifelong label merely because of their immaturity relative to older peers, Zoëga's group argued.

Parents also might want to consider these results in deciding when to start their kids in school, they suggested.

Given controversy on the subject, the investigators used national databases from Iceland to pull together the evidence on standardized test results and filled psychotropic drug prescriptions among all 11,785 children tested at age 9 to 12 there.

The youngest students in fourth grade, born in September to December, came in 10 percentiles lower on average on standardized tests in both math and language arts than the oldest third, born in January to April.

By seventh grade, the difference was smaller but still substantial. Averages were seven percentiles lower for the youngest third versus the oldest third in both areas.

Prescription of stimulant medication for ADHD as a measure of behavioral difficulties showed higher rates for younger kids. The rates rose from 5.3 percent in the oldest third to 5.6 percent in the middle group born in May to August to 8 percent for the youngest third.

Both standardized test scores and ADHD prescriptions showed significant effects of age strata for girls as well as boys.

The researchers cautioned that these measures may only partially predict long-term academic and psychiatric outcomes.

Nor could the study rule out possible undertreatment of ADHD in the oldest kids as the mechanism rather than overtreatment in the youngest, the investigators noted.

Generalizability may also be an issue, as Iceland's universal healthcare as well as other local educational, structural, and cultural factors may have influenced the results, they acknowledged.

They pointed to a large U.S. study showing double the risk of diagnosis or treatment for ADHD in children born in the 4 months prior to the school eligibility age cutoff.

Views: 102

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service