A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Why Aren’t Women’s Academic Successes Paying Off in the Workplace?
In this article in The Atlantic, Garance Franke-Ruta comments on Lean In, the new book by Sheryl Sandberg that exhorts women to take more risks, speak up, negotiate better working conditions, and propel themselves higher. The mystery, says Franke-Ruta, is why women’s success in universities, where for years they have outnumbered men in undergraduate and graduate programs and earned better grades, hasn’t translated into more success in the workplace (only 4.2 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs are women).
The reason, she says, is that in the real world, a number of forces operate to women’s disadvantage:
• Sexism – Studies show women are offered lower starting salaries, are judged more negatively, and get more criticism and less praise than men with the same credentials.
• Reticence – Many women shy away from self-promotion: 57 percent of men negotiate their first salary versus 7 percent of women. Women also set less-ambitious goals for themselves than men with the same skills and qualifications.
• Built-in barriers – To prove discrimination, women must initiate a grievance against their bosses, which is inherently difficult.
• The “tiara syndrome” – Many women believe that studying and careful preparation will be recognized and result in a figurative tiara being placed on their heads. But in most jobs, personality and networking count more than formal qualifications and hard work.
• Passivity – Many women absorb this from the high school and college dating scene. “Men learn early that to woo women, they must risk rejection and be persistent,” says Franke-Ruta. “Straight women, for their part, learn from their earliest years that they must wait to be courted. The professional world does not reward the second approach.”
• A defensive posture – “To be female in our culture is to be trained from puberty in the art of rebuffing,” says Franke-Ruta, “– rebuffing gazes, comments, touches, propositions, and proposals.” No wonder those who are looking for discussion panel members or op-ed articles say it’s harder to get women to say yes than men.
• Naiveté about academic credentials – “I’ve come to think of this as intellectual primping,” says Franke-Ruta, “the frequently futile hope that one more degree will finally win notice, and with it, the perfect job or raise.”
So what will level the playing field? Assertiveness. Not being shy about skills and accomplishments. Networking. Risk-taking. Leaning in.
“Miss Education: Why Women’s Success in Higher Education Hasn’t Led to More Female Leaders” by Garance Franke-Ruta in The Atlantic, April 2013 (Vol. 311, #3, p. 28-29), no e-link available
From the Marshall Memo #478
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.