The School Apps Are Out of Control: Why More Communication Isn't Always Better

Summary for Educators


Based on: “The School Apps Are Out of Control”
Author: Stephanie H. Murray
Source: The Atlantic | November 6, 2026

Original Article: Read the full article in The Atlantic


THE BIG IDEA

Schools are communicating more with parents than ever before—but are parents actually better informed about their children's learning?

In this revealing Atlantic article, Stephanie H. Murray explores a troubling contradiction in modern education: Parents are drowning in school notifications, yet many remain uncertain about whether their children are academically successful.

Between ClassDojo, PowerSchool, Google Classroom, ParentSquare, email, text messages, and traditional paper notices, families receive an almost continuous stream of information. Unfortunately, much of it concerns routine activities, schedules, and announcements rather than meaningful academic progress.

The problem extends beyond technological overload. Grades frequently reflect effort, assignment completion, and classroom participation rather than mastery of grade-level standards. Consequently, parents may believe their children are performing well even when assessments indicate otherwise.

Murray's central argument challenges school leaders to reconsider what effective parent communication actually means. The goal shouldn't be sending more information. It should help families understand what matters most about their children's education.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

1. Parents Are Overwhelmed by Communication Platforms

Schools frequently introduce new communication applications without retiring older systems.

One parent interviewed for the article reported using four separate communication apps for children attending the same school, plus another platform for assessment scores.

The result is fragmented information, duplicate announcements, and confusion about where to find important messages.

2. More Information Doesn't Mean Greater Understanding

The article cites Learning Heroes research showing that approximately:

  • 88% of parents believe their children perform at or above grade level in reading.
  • 83% of parents believe their children perform at or above grade level in mathematics.

Yet in most states, fewer than half of students meet grade-level expectations on state assessments.

This substantial disconnect suggests that school communication often fails to convey the most important information about student learning.

3. Good Grades Can Create False Confidence

Parents understandably assume that strong report-card grades indicate academic proficiency.

However, grades may reflect homework completion, effort, behavior, participation, and extra credit.

Murray describes a parent whose child's classroom evaluations appeared reassuring despite concerning reading assessment results. Only an independent evaluation revealed the extent of the child's difficulties.

A good report card does not necessarily mean a student is meeting grade-level expectations.

4. Teachers Are Caught in the Middle

Teachers often have limited control over the communication platforms their districts adopt.

Administrators, individual schools, departments, and parent organizations may each use different systems.

Meanwhile, families have different communication preferences, creating additional pressure to send the same information through multiple channels.

The burden of managing these systems consumes time that could otherwise be devoted to instruction and meaningful parent engagement.

5. Parent-Teacher Conferences Are Declining

According to Learning Heroes data cited in the article, parent participation in K–8 conferences declined from 77% in 2017 to 57% in the latest survey.

This decline is particularly concerning because sensitive discussions about academic difficulties often require personal conversations.

A notification cannot replace a teacher carefully explaining that a child is struggling with reading, mathematics, or other essential skills.

6. Technology Cannot Replace Trust

Perhaps the article's most important conclusion is that effective school-home communication depends on relationships rather than applications.

Parents need teachers who will communicate academic concerns clearly and honestly.

Teachers need parents who are willing to hear difficult information and collaborate on solutions.

Neither responsibility can be automated.


WHY IT MATTERS

For principals and superintendents, this issue raises important questions about communication practices, academic transparency, and family engagement.

Districts invest considerable resources in communication technology, yet rarely evaluate whether those investments improve parents' understanding of student achievement.

A school might send hundreds of messages yet fail to communicate one essential fact: a child is substantially behind grade level.

The consequences extend beyond inconvenience. When families misunderstand academic performance, opportunities for early intervention may be lost.

School leaders must therefore distinguish between communication activity and communication effectiveness.

The appropriate measure of success isn't how many messages schools send, but whether parents understand their children's academic strengths, needs, and progress.


LEADERSHIP ACTION STEPS

1. Conduct a communication audit.
Inventory every platform used to contact families. Identify duplication, unnecessary notifications, and opportunities to consolidate communication.

2. Establish a primary communication channel.
Designate one reliable place where families can find essential announcements, assignments, assessment information, and teacher messages. Provide accessible alternatives for families who need them.

3. Make academic progress understandable.
Provide parents with straightforward explanations of grade-level expectations, assessment results, and the relationship between classroom grades and academic mastery.

4. Prioritize meaningful conversations.
Establish expectations that significant academic concerns should prompt direct, personal communication rather than relying exclusively on electronic notifications.

5. Ask parents what they actually understand.
Survey families about whether they know their children's reading and mathematics levels, academic strengths, and areas requiring improvement. Use the results to evaluate communication effectiveness.


LEADER REFLECTION

If parents in your school received half as many notifications but twice as much meaningful information about their children's academic progress, would your school be communicating more effectively?

Consider asking your leadership team:

Do our communication systems primarily tell parents what's happening at school—or do they help parents understand how well their children are learning?


Original Article

------------------------------ 

Prepared with the assistance of OpenAI's AI software. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com

Views: 6

▶ Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

NOW LISTED AT #15!

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.  Click here to explore and contribute an article.

Also, consider the exciting learning opportunity offered through the Mentors.net AI Academy.

Click to learn more.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service