The Essay AI Can't Write: Rethinking Authentic Student Learning

Summary for Educators

Based on Tom Kaspers
"To Stop My Students from Using AI, I Assigned a New Kind of Essay." The Boston Globe, April 19, 2026. Tom Kaspers is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago.

🔵 THE BIG IDEA (120–150 words)

Rather than trying to catch students using AI, Tom Kaspers redesigned the assignment itself. Instead of individual take-home essays that could easily be generated by ChatGPT, his philosophy students collaborated to produce a single class-wide essay while he participated as a mentor, editor, and thought partner. Every student contributed ideas, defended arguments, revised classmates' work, and participated in ongoing discussions. The result was more authentic engagement, stronger writing, and deeper ownership of learning. Kaspers argues that the real challenge isn't simply preventing AI use—it is creating assignments that require students to think, collaborate, revise, and defend their reasoning in ways AI cannot easily replace. When the learning process becomes visible, meaningful, and collaborative, students have far less incentive to outsource their thinking.


🔵 KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR EDUCATORS

• Design assignments that emphasize process as much as final products.

• Require students to explain, defend, and revise their thinking publicly.

• Build structured collaboration into major writing projects.

• Assess drafts, discussions, and revisions—not just finished essays.

• Position teachers as thinking partners who coach students through complex ideas.

• Create authentic audiences and purposes that make student work meaningful.


◻️ WHY IT MATTERS (75–100 words)

Artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed traditional writing assignments. Rather than relying on AI detection software, educators have an opportunity to rethink assessment itself. Authentic tasks that emphasize collaboration, critical thinking, revision, and intellectual dialogue make learning more engaging while reducing opportunities for inappropriate AI use. As schools develop AI policies, instructional redesign—not simply enforcement—may become the most powerful strategy for preserving academic integrity while strengthening student learning.


🟢 LEADERSHIP ACTION STEPS

Encourage teachers to redesign assignments around authentic thinking rather than simple content production.

Promote collaborative learning experiences that require discussion, revision, and peer feedback.

Support professional learning on AI-responsive assessment practices.

Evaluate student learning through multiple forms of evidence, including drafts and conferences.

Celebrate instructional innovation that strengthens authentic student engagement.


🟡 LEADER REFLECTION

If AI can instantly generate an acceptable essay, what kinds of assignments will best reveal students' genuine thinking, curiosity, and understanding?

Original Article

“To Stop My Students from Using AI, I Assigned a New Kind of Essay” by Tom Kaspers in The Boston Globe, April 19, 2026; Kaspers can be reached at kaspers@uchicago.edu

------------------------------

Prepared with the assistance of AI software

OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com

Views: 12

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service