A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe

Teacher evaluations are a sticky issue with a thorny history, largely due to the high stakes woven into them in recent years. By letting student test scores formally reflect how well teachers were doing their jobs, pressure to perform and avoid job losses and school closures grew. Ultimately, this gave some educators an incentive to increase scores and graduation rates by any means available to them, leading to cheating. In Atlanta, a high-profile cheating scandal resulted in nearly a dozen educators being found guilty of conspiringto falsify students’ test scores. Other states, like New York, have also battled similar issues.
Education Week: ESSA Loosens Reins on Teacher Evaluations, Qualifications
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.