Court: N.Y. Teacher Evaluations Too Dependent on Tests

A New York state court ruled Wednesday that a new teacher evaluation process can't rely so heavily on how students perform on a few state tests.

But the mixed judgment also upheld an expedited review process that could speed up the firing of bad teachers.

The decision in Supreme Court in Albany County addresses a landmark teacher evaluation system worked out by the state Board of Regents with the New York State United Teachers union. That plan was abruptly changed by the Regents after Gov. Andrew Cuomo interceded to further emphasize student test performance.

Wednesday's decision states that although 40 percent of a teacher's evaluation can still be based on test scores, half of those tests must be chosen by local school districts through collective bargaining with their union.

Views: 211

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

/

The well researched theories of motivation have been on my mind during the time NYS embarked on the re-vamping of teacher and principal evaluations (e.g. APPR).  Above is a table that demonstrates quite visually Herzberg's theory of motivation factors.  Undoubtedly the new APPR will have a dramatic effect on "how the business of school is run."  Teachers will be concentrating on test scores and not diagnostic, enthusiastic, purposeful instruction.  In addition, "supervision" is likely to be greatly affected in the sense that principals will not be supportive of teachers in need of and willing of support to help children, but more focused on getting rid of "dead weight" and getting in people who can "just do the job" whatever that now turns out to be.  These factors will no doubt lead to tense "working conditions" and a lack of trust between faculty and administration, another negative factor when attempting to motivate employees.

 

I mean this as no disrespect, but I am left to wonder how long it has been since the lawmakers and governor have had a course in motivation theory.  After all, if this new evaluation system is meant to motivate educators to raise to new heights and do a better job, it seems that with careful examination, through the lens of research-based personal motivation theories, it is destined to have the exact opposite effect. 

 

Regards,

Linda Tillinghast

 

RSS

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

FOLLOW SL 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service