Comparing the PARCC and Smarter Balanced Assessments

(Originally titled “Coming Soon: A New Generation of Assessments”)

In this Educational Leadership article, K-12 Center at ETS director Nancy Doorey provides a helpful guide to the Common Core-aligned assessments that PARCC and Smarter Balanced consortia are crafting for 2014-15 implementation:

Major similarities between PARCC and Smarter Balanced:

  • The assessments will be taken on computers for students in grades 3-8 and in high-school ELA, literacy, and math.
  • There will be a variety of assessment items: selected-response, constructed response, technology-enhanced, and complex performance tasks. 
  • There will be two required components, both given in the final weeks of the school year.
  • By using electronic and human scoring, results will be available within two weeks.
  • There will be optional interim assessments, professional development modules, formative items and tasks for classroom use, model curriculum units, an online reporting suite, and a digital library for sharing vetted resources and tools. 
  • The cost for all summative components will be about $20 per student per year.

Key differences:

  • PARCC summative assessments will use fixed-form delivery – students take one of several fixed, equated sets of items and tasks.
  • Smarter Balanced will use adaptive delivery – students get an individually tailored set of items and tasks depending on their responses as they take the tests, and there will be a retake option for the end-of-year component.
  • PARCC will have one optional diagnostic and one optional midyear assessment, with the latter containing mostly tasks similar to the summative performance-based tasks. It will have optional K-2 formative performance tasks and a required, non-summative speaking and listening assessment for grades 3-8 and high school, locally scored.
  • Smarter Balanced will have optional interim assessments for grades 3-12, computer adaptive with multiple item types, including performance tasks. The number, timing, and scope will be locally determined.

For PARCC test items and prototypes: www.parcconline.org/samples/item-task-prototypes

For Smarter Balanced items: www.smarterbalanced.org/sample-items-and-performance-tasks

For a map of which states are in PARCC and which are in Smarter Balanced, see

http://www.governing.com/blogs/view/two-paths-toward-common-core-st... 

“Coming Soon: A New Generation of Assessments” by Nancy Doorey in Educational Leadership, December 2012/January 2013 (Vol. 70, #4, p. 28-34), www.ascd.org; Doorey can be reached at ndoorey@k12.center.org

From the Marshall Memo #464

 

Views: 7318

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service