A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
We (meaning all of us -- educators, parents, businesspeople, politicians and others) often default to an economic argument in discussions of public education, no matter the particular initiative at hand. The economic argument resonates with the public, which understands the importance of education in getting a good job and providing for one's family.
Often ignored is the importance of the civic mission of schools -- schools' role in preparing students to be active and engaged citizens in their communities and the world. Our country's founders viewed education as a cornerstone to our democracy and designed our government assuming an educated citizenry. Considering the current state of our democracy (with partisan politics resulting in policy gridlock), it is concerning that the civic mission of public schools is so neglected, particularly given the lack of civic knowledge of our youth (evidenced by their poor performance on the 2010 NAEP in Civics) -- and low civic engagement (for example, just 41.2 percent of youth -- voters age 18-24 -- turned out for the 2012 presidential election).
But the Common Core could change that. While the standards focus on English Language Arts and mathematics, a recent briefing sponsored by the Albert Shanker Institute and the American Federation of Teachers highlighted how the Common Core could reinvigorate the civic mission of schools.
In addition to providing a more equitable and improved educational experience, which will (as panelist Meira Levinson pointed out) serve the civic mission of schools in and of itself, there are specifics in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) that promote this agenda. Panelist Ross Weiner noted that the only content the standards prescribe is that all students read three foundational documents of American democracy -- the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States and Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address -- by the time they graduate high school.
Perhaps more importantly, while the CCSS explicitly articulate little content, they describe the skills and abilities that we want students to demonstrate -- many of which are just as relevant to civic participation as they are to college and career readiness (for example, the comprehension and use of complex texts, the capacity to analyze a problem, statistical literacy and purposeful oral and written communication). Want specifics? Consider a few of the speaking and listening, reading and writing anchor standards:
If students demonstrate competencies in these areas, they will likely succeed in a career or higher education environment, and they can transfer these skills to vote knowledgeably on candidates and ballot initiatives, be a good juror, effectively communicate concerns to elected leaders and mediate conflicts that arise in the community or workplace.
There are also more specific standards that point to student knowledge of our nation's founding, important in improving the civic learning of students. For example:
Even in math, as Weiner pointed out, the focus on quantitative literacy is important to civic participation. As evidenced by recent politics around the federal budget, those in Washington, DC, are stuck in debates that involve math that is not well understood even by those who need to vote on policies based on it.
Of course, as panelists made clear and I must reiterate, the Common Core does not include standards for social studies or science. In addition, the ELA and math standards mainly describe important skills. They need to be filled in with content, which can be done to support the civic mission of schools if so desired.
As Weiner noted, the civic promise of the Common Core is not self-executing -- "If we don't decide that this is going to be a priority in Common Core implementation, it won't happen."
To advance the agenda, he suggested practical actions for education decision makers, including:
Common Core advocates also need to talk about this aspect of the initiative as central to its purpose and success. Not only will such rhetoric keep it in the forefront as implementation progresses, it has the potential to build support for the CCSS among those who wonder if ELA and math standards are all we want out of our children's education.
Library of Congress Teacher Resources, which includes classroom materials and professional development to help teachers effectively use primary sources from its vast digital collections. These resources are aligned to Common Core standards, state standards and the standards of national organizations. For example, there are 296 classroom materials aligned to CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.9-10.9 (referenced above), including 55 lesson plans.
Share My Lesson, a free platform where educators come together to create and share teaching resources. It has a significant resource bank for Common Core State Standards, covering all aspects of the CCSS, searchable by standard.
Project Citizen, a curricular program at the middle school through adult levels promoting competent and responsible participation with government. It requires students find a problem in their community, research alternatives and work to solve it either through a project or lobbying for policy change. (Unfortunately, the curriculum, which has been aligned to the Common Core, is not free.)
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.