Common-Core Aligned Basal Readers – Or Something Different?

Common-Core Aligned Basal Readers – Or Something Different?

In this Education Week article, Stephen Sawchuk reports on how textbook publishers are working to align their basal readers with the Common Core State Standards. Sawchuk reviewed the fifth-grade reading series published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (Journeys), Pearson (Reading Street), and McGraw-Hill (Treasures) and found significant changes in the most recent editions in terms of the demands made on students, as well as shifts in the teachers’ guide suggestions. The companies have also created supplementary guides to upgrade their pre-common-core editions, although, Sawchuk reports, some state adoption committees have been critical of these backfill efforts. 

Some state leaders are having doubts about whether the new basal editions truly reflect the common core. John White, state commissioner in Louisiana, says he is hesitating to recommend any basals to his board for adoption. “I’m very concerned that the questions, the assessments, the text complexity, and other dimensions of the textbooks are not remotely ready to be called ‘aligned’ with the common core,” says White. “My strong belief is that if we make a mistake and allow textbooks to go forward with our endorsement, it will indicate that they are rigorous in a way many, if not all of them, probably are not.”

Other educators wonder whether children’s books might be better than textbooks to bring students up to the new standards. “If you read deeply into the common core,” says Peter Dewitz of Mary Baldwin College, “it’s the ability to trace and track the development of an idea or a character over time. Essentially from 3rd grade up, they are talking about books.” 

Some districts are moving in this direction, and are hoping for an iTunes-type service that will make books and other materials readily available online. There’s also interest in using free and open-source Internet materials to craft lessons. “I have a sense from teachers,” says White (the Louisiana commissioner), “that they are going to want greater control over decisions that heretofore have been oftentimes left to publishers or central offices.” 

Another approach is working with smaller publishers to customize materials. The New York State Education Department is working with Expeditionary Learning and the Core Knowledge Foundation to create a comprehensive K-2 literacy curriculum and modules for grades 3-5. “It’s really, really hard work,” says Kate Gerson, a New York official. “We are really struggling and celebrating as we toil to make sure the materials we are producing will support teachers in their implementation of the standards, while leaving room for them to adapt and improve, and to inhabit texts in a very different way with students.” 

“New Texts Aim to Capture Standards” by Stephen Sawchuk in Education Week, Nov. 14, 2012 (Vol. 32, #12, p. S21-S22), www.edweek.org 

From the Marshall Memo #462

 

Views: 973

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service