A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Better News for One-to-One Laptop Programs
In this Education Week article, Leo Doran and Benjamin Herold report on a first-of-its-kind meta-analysis of 15 years of research on the impact of one-to-one school laptop initiatives. Contrary to skeptical reports in recent years, this study found a statistically significant positive impact on student test scores in ELA, writing, math, and science when students were given one-to-one access to laptops. A further review of 86 additional papers found modest evidence of more student-centered and project-based instruction, improved student engagement, better teacher-student relationships, and increased student use of technology for reading, writing, Internet research, note-taking, and completing assignments. Students expressed “very positive” attitudes about using laptops in school, and studies consistently found higher student engagement, motivation, and persistence when laptops were used. (The researchers cautioned that their study applied only to laptops, not tablets, smartphones, and desktop computers.)
“It’s not like just providing a laptop to every student will automatically increase student achievement,” said study honcho Binbin Zheng of Michigan State University, “but we find that it’s the first step.” That said, the effect of laptops was noticeably less than other interventions such as smaller class size or individual tutoring. Laptop results, says Zheng, are “small but noteworthy.” The real benefit of using laptops, says Elliot Soloway of the University of Michigan, is going beyond “instructive” electronic-worksheet activities to “constructive” learning, from “teaching kids to remember something to teaching them how to figure something out.”
“Many of the benefits of 1-to-1 laptop programs are not detected by standardized tests,” says Zheng. “For the many programs whose purpose is to help each student be a better 21st-century citizen, we need to develop and use corresponding measures.”
“1-to-1 Laptop Initiatives Boost Student Scores, Study Finds” by Leo Doran and Benjamin Herold in Education Week, May 18, 2016 (Vol. 35, #31, p. 11), www.edweek.org; the full study is entitled “Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis” by Binbin Zheng, Mark Warshauer, Chin-Hsi Lin, and Chi Chang, published online in early 2016 in Review of Educational Research, available for purchase at http://rer.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/02/03/0034654316628645.abstract?rss=1.
From the Marshall Memo #638
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.