A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Comparing Science Achievement Among 15-Year-Olds Worldwide
In this New York Times article, Hannah Fairfield reports the results of a science test given to a representative sample of 15-year-olds in 65 OECD countries. In most, girls outperformed boys – but not in the United States and most western- and northern-European countries. Why? Because different countries offer different incentives and convey different expectations about female achievement in science. In the some countries, boys are more likely to “see science as something that affects their life,” says Andreas Schleicher, who oversees the OECD tests. And then there’s stereotype threat originating in gender expectations, which are formed as early as four years old.
Click the link below to view the detailed chart of countries’ achievement; you can see
which country each dot is by hovering over it with your cursor, and view an analysis of different countries by clicking the numbers in the top right-hand corner.
“Clues to a Troubling Gap” by Hannah Fairfield in The New York Times, Feb. 5, 2013 (p. D1, D3), http://nyti.ms/VQXfOZ
From the Marshall Memo #472
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.