Recently, there has been a lot of media attention on cheating and exam security. We’re seeing more and more cases of students, and an even greater number of teachers, trying to navigate their way around the system.

 

In the story “The Perfect Score: Cheating on the SAT”  from “60 Minutes,” Sam Eshaghoff, a 19-year-old Emory University student from Long Island, New York, is facing criminal fraud and impersonation charges for taking the SAT and ACT tests for other students. He is accused of taking the tests 16 times in three years, earning as much as $2,500 per test.

 

According to the report, Eshaghoff would print a copy of his own school ID (both paper and plastic) with the intended exam taker’s name and date of birth. At the test site, all he had to do was flash the ID for the test proctor to match the name on the ID to the name on the list, and then sit down and take the test. It was as easy as that.

 

This case proves that a good exam security plan does not stop at the check-in table. It should be multi-level. In the case of computer-based exams, for example, it should include qualifying and authenticating exam takers, securing the computer, controlling access to applications and local files, blocking access to the Internet, and training test proctors thoroughly. Unfortunately, there will always be someone who tries to find a way around the security measures that have been put into place.

 

In a related news story, “NY Senator Wants Prison Time For College Entrance Exam Cheaters,” from CBS 2 in New York, a senator wants to make cheating on college entrance exams a felony, punishable by prison sentences. Lawmakers are looking at a high-tech system aimed at preventing cheating, which would involve:

  • Mandatory pre-registration at a student’s home school with official legal ID documents only
  • Unique digital DNA created and assigned to an ID card with covert authentication marks printed on it
  • Instant identity verification by proctors using a simple UV light and smart phone scan

 

Although there are people like the senator out there who want to change the system, the Educational Testing Service and the College Board need to reach an agreement that change is imperative. In the end, cheaters never prosper. Instead, they’ll find themselves in serious legal situations or in a college or professional program that they aren’t realistically qualified to attend.

 

 

 

 

Views: 114

Comment

You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service