I have been to several trainings related to the rubric development for the new APPR--We have heard the acronym--
Highly Effective, Effective, Developing and Ineffective
and then we have been seeing the reverse--
which is:
Ineffective, Developing, Effective, Highly Effective--IDEH

It would probably be in our best interest to use the 'Hedi' plan, because at least that starts us at the top--I have not reviewed any material that includes 'ineffective' or 'unsatisfactory' as the first category on a rubric from the past--can we set our expectations a bit higher-and begin with 'highly effective'--as we move toward selection of a rubric? We need to be aware of the language we are using and how the use of language/terminology is not the sole focus of our work. We need less 'jargon' and a real focus on sound instructional practices and the ability to reflect on our work--
Having high expectations for ourselves is the first step--so 'HEDI' may be the way to go!

Any thoughts on this topic?

Views: 485

Replies to This Discussion

I agree! I think each school community needs to develop a common language and common understanding of the jargon in the rubrics. For example in Danielson's Rubric 3C it states "students are inetrllectually engaged in challenging content." I am sure we all agree that this should occur. However, I think most teachers would feel there classroom tasks were of this caliber even if a supervisor may disagree. Schools need to have frank, transparent conversations and collaboratively develop a set of expectations that represent what this would look, feel and sound like in the school.

I agree with you, John.   It might look like small groups discussing the same Math problem at 5 practice stations around the room, and then returning to their seats to solve a similar problem on their own.  It might look like a Socratic Circle activity in an English or Social Studies class, where students analyze text during a close reading that is lead by student leaders for the day.  It might look like a Paired Learner Activity in a Science or Math classroom where partners engage in a brief task together, making sense of content the teacher just presented to the whole class.  But, as you said, to make a real difference, teachers need to collaboratively decide which strategies would be most effective for deep learning and, then, use these strategies throughout the grade levels and across the curriculum.






As is our usual custom,SL 2.0 will donate 100% of all new membership fees in May to LI Cares- Harry Chapin Food Bank.  We encourage all educators to also contribute to this worthy charity.  Just click here.

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.


Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.


Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)





School Leadership 2.0

© 2023   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service